|
McCreary
Central high School COMPREHENSIVE
SCHOOl IMPROVEMENT Plan SCHOOL ASSURANCE REVIEW SCHOOL YEAR 2005-2007 The McCreary
Central High School council and planning committee reviewed the Assurances in
the Kentucky Comprehensive Improvement Planning School Framework
(2004) prior to approval of our plan. David Cothron
chairperson, School Council Date:
March 21, 2005 Donna Caldwell
chairperson, School Planning Committee Date:
March 21, 2005 Plan Approved by the
School Council: March 21, 2005 School Council
Members:
|
|
McCreary Central High
School Mission Statement: Our mission at McCreary
Central High School is to offer all students a challenging education in a
safe and caring environment that ensures a successful transition to the adult
world. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ·
The entire faculty reviewed the 2004 Kentucky
Performance Report; they worked in departmental groups and reviewed the data
that pertained to the school as a whole and then their department
specifically. A list of Identified
needs was compiled. The school
planning committee, which is made up of department chairs, reviewed the list
of Needs and selected our Priority Needs and Goals. In September 2005 the staff reviewed the 2005 KPR and the new
data was inserted in this document. ·
The School Council approved the Priority Needs,
Causes, Goals, and Objectives at the November meeting. ·
Substantive achievement gaps exist in all content
areas. The SBDM council chose to
focus on students with disabilities, as this is the largest gap. The council in the November meeting
approved the Targeted Gap Reductions. ·
The council reviewed and approved the CSIP at the
March meeting ·
The public was invited to review the CSIP at the
Open House on March 22. ·
The SBDM council at each council meeting will
evaluate the Comprehensive School Improvement Plan with a report from the
component managers on the Implementation and Impact of the plan. ·
The entire staff reviewed the 2005 Kentucky
Performance Report and used that information to develop a list of strategies
that each department would use to help close the achievement gaps. ·
The CSIP committee revised the CSIP based on 2005
KPR data and feedback from the staff after the data disaggregation updated
the CSIP. |
Gap Reduction Targets
Senate Bill 168
District Name: McCreary County Schools Principal: David Cothron
School Name: McCreary Central High School Date: March 13, 2006
|
Group (s) with Substantive Gaps: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After reviewing the 2005 CATS performance data our SBDM Council has determined that we have a substantive achievement gap in all content areas and all sub-groups. The chart below is the academic index for each sub-group and each content area.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rational: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following is the rational for identifying substantive gaps in the following content areas: The SBDM council is going
to focus on students with disabilities vs students with out disabilities
because in each of the content areas this is where the greatest gap
exists. We feel that by targeting
this sub-group we will impact all students and our goal is to improve
instruction and learning for all students. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Expected Target (s) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following are the reduction targets that our Council has set forth:
|
|
Action Component: Academic Achievement Component Manager: Mike Baker |
|
Priority
Need (Identifies
past weaknesses in student performances) |
Goal (Addresses the Priority Need) |
|
According to the 2005 Kentucky Performance Report: 1. Our
Accountability Index is 62.00 and that is 10.5 points below our goal of 72.5. 2. The
percent of our students scoring novice is 31.92, this is 6.09 points below
our novice reduction goal of 25.83%. |
By the 2006 Kentucky Performance Report: 1. Our
academic index will meet or exceed the goal of 72.5. 2. The
percent of students scoring novice will meet or exceed our goal of 25.83. |
|
Academic Achievement Causes and Contributing
Factors |
Academic Achievement Objectives with
Measures of Success |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to the 2005 KPR 1.1.Our
reading academic index (64.6) has not shown consistent improvement over the
last 5 years and is currently 12.86 points below the state average. 1.2
According to the student survey on the KPR:
57%
report that they read newspapers, magazines, etc one time a week or less, 45%
spend less than an hour a day reading in the content areas, 32%
write less than once a week. |
According to the 2006 KPR 1.1
The reading academic index will increase to 75.1. 1.2
The 2006 Kentucky Performance Report Student Surveys will reflect: 45%
of the students read a newspaper at least twice a week; 50%
read one hour or more a day in the content areas 75%
write at least twice a week. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.1
The Percentage of students scoring novice is too high in all content areas: a.
Math: 51.24 b.
Arts and Humanities:
33.33 c.
Reading: 17.00 d.
Science: 37.04 e.
Social Studies: 25.92 f.
Practical
Living/vocational Studies: 25.70 g.
Writing: 32.06 |
2.1
The percentage of students scoring novice will decrease in all content areas
as listed below: a.
Math: 33 b.
Arts and Humanities:
26 a.
Reading: 16 b.
Science: 24 c.
Social Studies: 16 d.
Practical
Living/vocational Studies: 21 e.
Writing: 26 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.2
There is a substantive achievement gap in the following areas and sub-groups:
Academic Index in each
content area:
Academic Index for
Sub-populations
|
2.2 The gap between
students with disabilities and students without disabilities will decrease in
all content areas. Academic Index for each
content area:
Goal for Academic Index
for Sub-Populations |
|
Objective Label |
Strategy/Activity |
Expected Impact in Terms of Progress and Success |
Responsible Person(s) |
When |
Estimated Resources and Costs |
|
1.1 1.1 1.1 |
1.1.a Staff members will
participate in effective professional development that will update their
content knowledge and they will integrate that knowledge into their classroom
instruction 1.1.b All curriculum maps
and lesson plans will be aligned with the revised Core Content 4.0 for the
2006/2007 school year. 1.1c Each department will
develop a list of specific strategies and activities that they will be using
in their instruction to address the needs of all students and address the
achievement gaps. |
1.1.a Variation in
instructional strategies will increase student engagement and therefore
student achievement. 1.1.b Students will
receive instruction aligned to the new Core Content and will be better
prepared for the KCCT. 1.1.c Specific strategies
will be regularly in all classrooms that will meet the needs of all students. |
PD
Coordinator Administration Department
chairs Teachers
PD
Coordinator Administration Teaches CSIP
committee Administrators Teachers |
On going 8/06 12/06 and on going |
PD funds Title 1 SEEK funds PD Funds Title 1 SEEK None |
|
1.2 1.2 1.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 |
1.2 a. Perkins Performance Measure Academic Proficiency (CATS): The school will begin a school wide
reading program that will involve all students. The program will require that all students engage in reading
each day and that all students be monitored by a certified staff member. Test scores show that there are gaps both
gender and economical. 1.2.b Reading and math
will be addressed school wide in a variety of ways which will include but not
be limited to: All students will
participate in a 20 minutes of Sustained Silent Reading each day. All students will read
from a real world source for at least 20 minutes each week (i.e., newspapers,
magazines, professional journals, etc.) Reading instruction will
be provided to all freshmen. (I.e. Extended reading, Corrective Reading, RAMP
UP) Students scoring at or
below the 15% on the reading portion of the CTBS will participate in The
Great Leaps Reading Program. Individual needs of
students will be addressed in math in a variety of ways based on student
data. The programs will include but
not be limited to; Catch-up Algebra SREB, Honors Algebra, Advanced math
courses and College preparatory courses 1.2c The school library
will be upgraded. The old books will
be weeded out and new books will be added that will improve the readability
and interest level of our collection. 2.1.a There will be
rewards and incentives for students who do well on the KCCT. 2.1 b Students will take
KCCT like tests at least twice a semester in each class. 2.1c Students will answer
Open Response questions and use a scoring guide to self assess 4 times each semester
in each class. |
1.2b Student reading
levels will improve. 1.2.b All students will
become better readers. Real world reading skills
and reading levels will improve. More students will be
successful in their math classes. More students will be
challenged in their math classes. Math scores will improve. The achievement gap
between the various sub groups will decrease. 1.2c Students will check
out and read more books. 2.1.a Student scores will
improve on the KCCT. 2.1b Students will perform
better on the KCCT. 2.1.c Academic achievement
will improve because students will be better prepared to answer open response
questions on the state assessment. |
All
teachers Administrators Counselors Department
Chairs All
teachers Administration Librarian Library
Book Committee Culture
Committee Administration All
teachers Dept.
Chairs Administrators All
teachers Dept.
Chairs Administrators |
9/05 On going 1/06 On going On going On going |
Perkins Title 1 SEEK Title 1 SEEK Title 1 Rural Schools Grant SEEK Donations YSC Title 1 None None |
|
2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2. 2 2.2 |
2.1.c Teachers
will use the KCCT Coach Books for journal entries, starter activities and
test questions 2.1.d Good Faith Efforts will be rewarded through planned
activities throughout the year and during the Kentucky Core Content Test. 2.1.f Portfolios will be
assembled and pre-scored after junior English. Students who submit novice level work will be required to
participate in the ESS program. 2.1.g Senior portfolios
will be pre-scored at the end of the first semester for students in 1st
semester English. Students performing
at the novice level will be provided an opportunity to revise and improve
their portfolio. 2.2.a Students will be
taught through a variety of research based instructional strategies.
2.2.b Information on gender
bias and gender-based learning will be incorporated into lesson plans and
instructional activities. |
2.1.c Students will be
better prepared when taking the KCCT and scores will improve. 2.1.d Students will be
more prepared to practice good testing techniques and there will be fewer
blanks and zeros. 2.1.f More portfolios will
score proficient or above. 2.1.g All students will
score at above the apprentice level on their portfolio. 2.2.a Students will be
actively engaged decreasing the gap between sub-populations. 2.2.b Students will
receive instruction geared to their needs. |
All
teachers Dept
Chairs Administrators BAC All
teachers Administrators English
Teachers Writing
Cluster Leader English
Teachers Writing
Cluster Leader English
Teachers Writing
Cluster Leader All
teachers PD
coordinator Administration |
On going On going 8/05 8/05 8/05 8/05 |
SEEK Title 1 Activities Accounts SEEK Donations SEEK Title 1 ESS Title 1 SEEK Title 1 PD SEEK PD Title 1 |
Action Component: Learning Environment Component
Managers: Charlotte
Coffey
|
Priority
Need (Identifies
past weakness in student performance) |
Goal (Addresses
the Priority Need) |
|
According to the 2006 Kentucky Performance Report: 1. Our
Accountability Index of 62.00 is 10.4 points below the state index and 10.5
points below our goal of 72.5. 2.
The percent of our students scoring novice is
31.92, this is 6.09 points below our novice reduction goal of 25.83%. |
By the 2007 Kentucky Performance Report: 1. Our
academic index will meet or exceed the goal of 72.5. 2. The percent of students scoring novice will meet or exceed our
goal of 25.83%. |
|
Causes and Contributing
Factors |
Objectives with
Measures of Success |
|
According to the 2003
Scholastic Review: 1.1 The school does not
use the employee evaluation and individual growth plans to improve staff
proficiency. 1.2 Teachers are not fully
aware of the certification evaluation process and do not use it to guide professional
development 1.3 The communication from
the school to parents and the community is limited. 1.4 According to
Professional Development records there has been limited follow-up to
professional development activities. 1.5 According to discipline
records, Freshmen make-up 44% of the discipline referrals at MCHS. According to the 2005
Kentucky Performance Report: 2.1 Our attendance average was 89.10% 2.2 Too many students scored non-performance, blanks
and zeros. According to the
2003-2004 Volunteer Database Documentation, informal interviews with parents
and students, and committee meetings sign-in log: 3.1 Parents and community
partners were not actively involved in the educational process at MCHS. |
According to the
Professional Development Plan, committee minutes, department meetings, and
faculty meeting agendas: 1.1 Administrators and teachers to guide professional
growth will use the evaluation process and Individual Growth plans. 1.2 Teachers will know about the evaluation process and
how to use it to guide their own professional growth. 1.3 According to a review of Standard 5 of the
Standards and Indicators for School Improvement, two-way communication will
improve. 1.4 There will be follow up for professional
development activities to see that they are being implemented into the
classroom instruction. 1.5 According to the discipline record at the end of
2006 less than 35% of discipline referrals will come from the freshmen. According to the 2006 Kentucky Performance Report: 2.1 Our attendance rate will be 93% 2.2 There will be no
students scoring non-performance, blanks or zeros. According to the
2005-2006 Volunteer Database Documentation, informal interviews with parents
and students, and committee meetings sign-in log: 3.1 Representatives from
parents, business leaders and community leaders will work collaboratively at
MCHS |
|
Objective Label |
Strategy/Activity |
Expected Impact in Terms of Progress and Success |
Responsible Person |
Start Date |
Estimated Resources and Costs |
|
1.1 |
1.1a Each certified staff
member will develop a Professional Growth Plan using information from the
evaluation process and the School Improvement Plan. |
1.1 Teachers will
demonstrate knowledge gained in their planning and classroom instruction. |
Teachers Administration |
June 05 |
None |
|
1.1 |
1.1bPerkins Performance Measure Career Major Certificates/Certificates of
Achievement: Guidance personal will
be assigned to complete IGP’s for all Career and Technical students who will
be assigned to a program area. Students
will be given a career goal map that will indicate course work that will
allow for completion of Career and Technical Programs |
1.1bStudents will be
involved in the planning process for their future, and will take more classes
with their career goals in mind; this will increase student involvement in
the classes. |
Guidance Counselors Advocacy Leaders |
Sept 05 |
None |
|
1.2 |
1.2 Certified staff
members will participate in a review of the evaluation process providing an
impetus for individual growth plans. |
1.2 Teachers will work
toward improving in all standards as evidenced by lesson plans, walkthroughs
and formal observations. |
Teachers Administration |
June 05 |
PD |
|
Objective Label |
Strategy/Activity |
Expected Impact in Terms of Progress and Success |
Responsible Person |
Start Date |
Estimated Resources and Costs |
|
1.3 |
1.3 Develop a plan to
improve communication among stakeholders. |
1.3 Better communication
will improve the school culture |
Committees Guidance YSC Administration |
June 05 |
None |
|
1.4 |
1.4.a Staff
members will work together during department |
1.4.a Implementation of
strategies will improve instruction and |
Department Chairs |
08/05 |
None |
|
|
meetings to provide professional development follow-up by
sharing how they are implementing the strategies and ideas that were learned
during specific professional development activities. |
student learning. |
Administration |
|
|
|
1.5 |
1.5
Conduct activities before school begins to help transition incoming Freshmen.
(i.e. YSC will distributes newsletter with pertinent information regarding
school policies and procedures, conduct Freshman orientation program before
school begins, host
events such as cook outs, ice cream socials etc for students and families to
interact with the staff of MCHS.) |
1.5 These activities will
enable a smoother transition and allow students to feel more connected to the
school. |
YSC Committees Teachers Administration |
08/05 |
YSC SEEK Donations |
|
Objective Label |
Strategy/Activity |
Expected Impact in Terms of Progress and Success |
Responsible Person |
Start Date |
Estimated Resources and Costs |
|||||||||||||
|
1.5 b |
1.5b Perkins
Performance Measure Successful
Transition: The maintenance of these
records will be assigned to staff to be maintained and reported
accurately. Student information
sheets will be review for completion by all students. |
1.5b Student data information will be correct. |
Administration |
09/05 |
$0 |
|||||||||||||
|
2.1 |
2.1.a At the end of each
nine weeks grading period we will have an assembly, activities, etc to reward
students with 93% or better attendance for that grading period. |
2.1.a Overall attendance
will improve to 93% and student achievement will improve. |
Family resource center School Culture and Climate
committee |
08/05 |
SEEK |
|||||||||||||
|
2.1 |
2.1.b Each teacher will
select two students per month and send a positive postcard home for those
students. |
2.1.b Attendance, student
morale and parent communications will all improve. |
Teachers Department Chair Administration |
04/05 |
SEEK |
|||||||||||||
|
2.2 |
2.2 There will be a school
wide activity for students who show a good faith effort, i.e., no blanks, no
zeros, and worked hard during the testing time. |
2.2.a There will be no
students scored as non-performance novice and overall achievement will
improve |
School Culture committee Teachers administering the
test. |
08/05 |
YSC Donations Title 1 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Projection of where scores need to be to
reach our goal of 72.5 by 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Academic
Indicators |
Novice-NP |
Novice-Med. |
Novice-High |
App.-Low |
App.-Med. |
App.-High |
Proficient |
Distinguished |
Academic Index |
100% Check |
|
|
|||||
|
Reading |
0.00 |
5.00 |
11.00 |
4.00 |
18.00 |
27.00 |
26.00 |
9.00 |
76.1100 |
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
Mathematics |
0.00 |
5.00 |
21.00 |
7.00 |
17.00 |
22.00 |
23.00 |
5.00 |
65.3500 |
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
Science |
0.00 |
4.00 |
20.00 |
6.00 |
16.00 |
23.00 |
27.00 |
4.00 |
68.7200 |
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
Social
Studies |
0.00 |
4.00 |
11.00 |
6.00 |
17.00 |
31.00 |
25.00 |
6.00 |
74.1800 |
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
Writing-OD |
0.00 |
21.00 |
|
|
51.00 |
|
25.00 |
3.00 |
|
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
Writing-Port. |
0.00 |
20.00 |
|
|
46.00 |
|
25.00 |
9.00 |
|
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
Writing |
0.00 |
20.20 |
|
|
47.00 |
|
25.00 |
7.80 |
66.7460 |
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
Art/Hum. |
0.00 |
20.00 |
|
|
30.00 |
|
35.00 |
15.00 |
76.6000 |
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
PL/Voc. |
0.00 |
20.00 |
|
|
36.00 |
|
35.00 |
9.00 |
71.8000 |
100 |
|
|
|||||
|
Novice |
20.866667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Non-Academic Indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Academic Index |
70.9 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Attendance |
93.00 |
Accountability Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Dropout
Rate |
2.01 |
CTBS |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Retention
Rate |
0.76 |
No. Students |
No Score |
1-24 %ile |
25-49 %ile |
50-74 %ile |
75-99 %ile |
Total |
|
|
|||||||
|
Successful
Transition |
88.82 |
72.1 |
284 |
14 |
111 |
70 |
49 |
40 |
51.7606 |
|
|
||||||
|
Non-Academic Index |
93.6158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
MCHS
Professional Development Plan
2006/2007 |
|
|
|
Based
on The Comprehensive School Improvement Plan, Professional Growth Plans, and
Staff surveys these are the topics that need to be addressed through
professional development. |
||
|
Activity
Number from the CSIP |
From
the CSIP |
|
|
1.1.c |
Content
area knowledge and instructional strategies |
|
|
1.2.b |
Real
world reading/ reading in the content areas |
|
|
1.2.c |
Corrective
and extended reading |
|
|
2.1.b |
Preparing
KCCT like tests |
|
|
2.2.a |
Research
based instructional strategies |
|
|
2.2.b |
Gender
differences in learning |
|
|
2.2 |
Strategies
to address all achievement gap areas |
|